If a project touches federal money — a federal agency, a school district or public university, a hospital drawing federal reimbursement, a bank under federal oversight, or any contractor on a federally funded site — the brand of camera on the wall stops being a budget question and becomes a compliance one.
What Section 889 requires
Section 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act bars federal agencies, and many recipients of federal funds and grants, from buying or using video surveillance and telecommunications equipment from a named list of manufacturers. For cameras the two that matter most are Hikvision and Dahua, together with the many other labels that resell their hardware — a longer list than most buyers expect, because both companies supply the internals for a wide range of other brands.
In 2022 the FCC went further and revoked equipment authorizations for new Hikvision and Dahua video surveillance gear sold into the United States on national-security grounds. In practice this equipment is increasingly hard to buy new and deploy legally anywhere a federal connection exists.
Who it covers across our Central-U.S. footprint
Restricted
- Federal agencies and their facilities
- State and local government spending federal grant dollars
- Public school districts and many universities
- Hospitals and clinics tied to federal reimbursement conditions
- Banks and financial institutions under federal oversight
- Contractors and integrators on federally funded sites
For these buyers Hikvision and Dahua are effectively off the table, and we will not specify them into a project we know carries a federal funding condition.
Generally unaffected
- Private commercial businesses with no federal funding
- Retail, hospitality, manufacturing and private property
- Projects paid for entirely with private money
For these buyers the restriction does not automatically apply and value-line equipment can be a sound choice. We still tell you exactly what you are buying and where it stands, so the decision is informed and it is yours.
One thing worth saying plainly: funding changes. A private facility that later accepts a federal grant, a school that wins federal money, or a business that takes on federal work can inherit the restriction after the cameras are already up. Where that is a realistic possibility, we flag it before anything is purchased.
The NDAA-compliant lines we install
The compliant options are excellent, and on several counts better than the equipment they replace. The manufacturers we install and support that carry NDAA compliance across their current camera lines include:
We are an authorized dealer for the lines we install, which for public-sector work matters twice over: it separates genuine compliant equipment with a real manufacturer support path from gray-market hardware whose provenance you cannot document when an auditor asks.
Replacing restricted equipment
If Hikvision or Dahua cameras are already installed and the site has since taken on federal funding, you are not starting from scratch. The cameras themselves usually have to be replaced, but the cabling, mounting and much of the network infrastructure carry over, which contains the cost. We survey what is there, identify what must go, and phase the swap around your operation rather than shutting it down.
We also document the change — what was removed, what replaced it, and the compliance status of the new equipment — because for a funded project the paperwork proving compliance matters as much as the compliance itself.
Ask before you buy
The most expensive version of this problem is the one found after installation. If there is any chance a project touches federal money — now or later — a short conversation before equipment is chosen is worth far more than a compliant camera bought after a non-compliant one has already been paid for. We serve government, education, healthcare, finance and commercial clients across the Central U.S., and we would rather tell you the awkward thing early than the expensive thing late.